India can now destroy live satellites, but what about space debris?

Using a live satellite in Low Earth Orbit (LEO) as target practice, India successfully tested an anti-satellite weapon, or A-SAT, today. This show of force has put India alongside the United States, Russia, and China in an elite club of space superpowers. And while there is no doubt that the indigenous feat is an important technological breakthrough for India, there is an important question that nobody seems to be asking: How worried should we be about the space debris created by the satellite we blew up?

When China demonstrated the prowess of its anti-satellite missile in 2007 by shooting down a weather spacecraft, FengYun 1C, the US Orbital Debris Program Office dubbed it as “the worst satellite breakup in history”. As of October 2016, CelesTrak, a repository of orbital element sets, had cataloged a total of 3,438 trackable fragments from the satellite’s wreckage. And these fragments would likely remain in orbit for decades to come – whizzing around at speeds of up to 17,500 miles per hour.

In 2010, the debris created by the Chinese satellite was orbiting so close to the International Space Station that astronauts onboard were cautioned to take shelter in the Russian Soyuz spacecraft docked with the station, lest the worst happened. In 2015, former astronaut and then-commander of the International Space Station, Terry Virts, had to relive the nightmare when leftover shrapnel forced him to maneuver the spaceship out of its way.

Space junk is a real issue with dangerous consequences for our satellite systems – even without A-SAT weapons adding to the problem. The European Space Agency estimates that today there are 34,000 pieces of space trash measuring more than 10 cm, 900,000 objects between 1 cm to 10 cm, and 128 million objects from 1 mm to 1 cm orbiting the Earth.

In 1978, NASA scientist Donald J. Kessler proposed a theory called the Kessler Syndrome which described the worst-case scenario of satellite collisions triggering a domino effect in space. As the number of collisions goes up, more debris is produced, which in turns increases the odds of even more crashes happening.

Today, a consortium of space companies and research institutions, led by the University of Surrey, is experimenting with a small satellite mission called RemoveDEBRIS to test various space junk removal strategies. India itself is a member of an international governmental forum – the Inter-Agency Space Debris Coordination Committee – which is dedicated to this task, and it would be interesting to see how the committee reacts to the actions India took today.

In the end, cleaning up the space environment still remains a technical and economic challenge. And the most important thing we can do is prevent the unnecessary creation of additional orbital waste. Maybe the next big mission for the Indian Space Research Organization could be space debris cleanup?

Say thanks for this article (0)
The community is supported by:
Become a sponsor
#Business #Featured
Call for nominations: Global Top 100 Geospatial Companies of 2024
Avatar for Muthukumar Kumar
Muthukumar Kumar 10.16.2023
#Contributing Writers #Featured #Fun #Ideas #People
Share Your Insights: Geoawesomeness is Looking for Contributing Writers
Nikita Marwaha Kraetzig 01.18.2024
#Business #Featured
Global Top 100 Geospatial Companies – 2024 Edition
Avatar for Muthukumar Kumar
Muthukumar Kumar 01.31.2024
Next article
#Business #Featured #Ideas

What is Blockchain, and how can it be used for mapping?

Blockchain has been one of the hottest topics in tech for some time – you may have heard it’s (in)famous cryptocurrency, Bitcoin. It is one of the most innovative and ingenious ways of passing information from A to B in fully automated and safe manner; the information would have to be verified by thousands of distributed computers, and tampering with information would be virtually impossible. The underlying technology is extremely relevant, perhaps even disruptive for many applications outside of finance. We’ll explain how it all began, how it works, then discuss a few use cases of blockchain for mapping.

How blockchain started

The research behind blockchain goes back to 1991, when they were called digital time stamps.

The two researchers, Haber and Stornetta, were trying to come up with a solution for the danger of having files stored on personal computers and how easy it would be to tamper with them. Instead of having to trust a central authority, the system could have many dispersed but interconnected copies of a shared ledge with digital timestamps. This would make it impossible to backdate or tamper with the documents, as any changes to a single document would invalidate all of the other copies.

However, it was only in 2009 when the still anonymous Satoshi Nakamoto went on to create Bitcoin that blockchain came to be known around the world.

What is blockchain?

Simply put, blockchain is a chain of blocks that contains information. It’s a distributed ledger that is completely open to the public, and once something is recorded in a block, it becomes very difficult to change it.

It starts with a single block, called the genesis block. The data stored inside a block depends on the type of blockchain. For transactional purposes, it may store details such as the sender, receiver, and the value of the transaction.

All blocks will have a hash and previous hash. It is an alphanumeric value is uniquely calculated once the block and its contents have been created. It acts as the ‘digital fingerprint’. If any information inside the block is changed, then the value of the hash will also change.

After putting some data into the block, a hash is calculated. Every block except for the genesis block will show the hash of the previous block.

Inside of each block is the hash of the previous block, and this is what effectively creates the chain and it’s also what makes blockchains secure.

The data in the 1st Block has been tampered with, which leads to the block to calculate a new hash. It no longer matches with the next block’s previous hash, and the entire blockchain is invalidated.

As you can see in this quick illustration, we have a chain of the first three words of Lorem Ipsum, and each block has the hash of the previous hash. Notice how the genesis block has no previous hash. Once the 1st block’s hash has been changed, it no longer matches the 2nd block’s previous, and this will invalidate the entire blockchain. As more data gets added to the blockchain, the more secure it will be. In real-life scenarios, block hashes have to meet specific difficulty requirements, but even that isn’t enough to prevent tampering, as computers could easily go through thousands of permutations per second until it revalidates itself after tampering.

Why you can’t cheat at Bitcoin. Credit to: https://medium.com/loom-network/understanding-blockchain-fundamentals-part-2-proof-of-work-proof-of-stake-b6ae907c7edb

One mechanism that mitigates this is proof of work, and it essentially slows down the addition of new data. If one block is tampered with, all of the previous hashes will need to be re-calculated.

You may have also heard of blockchain being powerful and secure because of decentralization. Instead of using a central authority to manage the chain, blockchains use a peer-to-peer (P2P) network. Similar to torrenting, you download a file from multiple peers who may have it, instead of a central server. Everybody is allowed to join in, and when they do, they receive a full copy of the blockchain.

When a new block of data is created, it gets sent to everyone in the network, and each ‘copy’ or rather, node of the blockchain has to verify it. The nodes will then come to a consensus of whether the new block is valid or not. The blocks that have been tampered with will be rejected, and if the block is valid, all of the nodes will add the block to their own blockchain. Since everything is shared on an immutable ledger, the information is on a blockchain is open for everybody to see. Hence, blockchain is probably one of the most transparent processes to date.

How can we use blockchain for mapping?

Supply-Chain Management

Using blockchain, there is a potential to track where everything came from. For example, IBM has developed blockchain technology for some food use cases. Consumers will be able to see exactly where their food came from and how it got to their table, ultimately increasing transparency, ensuring safety, and perhaps even gaining an awareness of the carbon footprint of their diet.



IoT is a combination of software, electronic, and a network that facilitates an exchange of data and interaction between objects and mechanisms. In the case of sensors, the application of blockchain will make historical readings nearly impossible to tamper with. The use of smart contracts will mean faster interaction between devices, eg. smartphone to bikeshare

Property Rights

As property rights and titles tend to be susceptible to fraud and dispute, having publicly-accessible and distributed ledgers can make many processes more efficient. It would also be useful for documenting damage, repairs, or improvements to the home, with no way of backdating the data once it is entered.

Spatial Verification

In general, blockchain can be used for spatial verification, confirming that people are where they say they are, and when they are there. Furthermore, the proof-of-location (PoL) protocol can use smart contracts to automatically do some validation for geographic data of objects. Crowdsourced mapping, such as on OpenStreetMap is often problematic, especially with a lack of permanent IDs and is subject to vandalism.

You can also read more about how Streetcred uses blockchain to tackle open point of interest (POI) data.

Challenges for Mapping with Blockchain

One of the main challenges of blockchain is that it requires a high level of trust between the parties. In the case of some organizations, valid participation is awarded by getting paid a small amount of tokens, which become more valuable as time goes on.

Some mapping data by nature is fluid and even subjective, and cannot simply just be “verified” or “rejected”. It will definitely be interesting to see if blockchain can be used while still granting fluidity and still accounting for the mapping needs of everybody.

There also is ongoing discussion of how we can use blockchain but still satisfy the right to be forgotten, as many of the suggested solutions would sacrifice many of the fundamental benefits of blockchain.

What do you think of Blockchain and its applications?

Further Reading
Want to know more? Here are a few links to look through.

Try a blockchain demo and see the code in action:

Read about why certain programming languages are used for blockchain:

A long and interesting read about the FOAM Proof of Location protocol:

Learn to code Ethereum DApps by building your own game:

Read on