Biggest satellite industry fails of 2017

Nobody said launching a satellite is easy. After all, it does require rocket science. But this year is far from over and we have already seen quite a few setbacks for some of the biggest names in the space industry. Take a look…

Biggest satellite industry fails of 2017

European Space Agency

What happened: Clocks on several Galileo satellites failed

The year began on a pretty ominous note when the European Space Agency (ESA) declared in January that the atomic clocks on a number of satellites in the Galileo satnav constellation had failed. Out of the 72 clocks launched till date, nine had become flawed. Though ESA didn’t declare any of the satellites as completely nonfunctional because of this glitch, Director General Jan Woerne acknowledged that more failing clocks meant reduced capability of Galileo and that was a serious issue. “If this failure has some systematic reason we have to be careful,” he told reporters in Paris.

The Galileo satnav system has already seen many setbacks, including the budget spiraling three times the original estimate in the last 17 years that it has taken to develop.

Biggest satellite industry fails of 2017

Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency

What happened: Japan’s smallest-ever rocket launch was a disaster

Also in January, Japan’s mini-rocket technology efforts ended up in deep water when the 32-feet rocket carrying a payload of 3 kg fell into the sea. According to the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency, after the rocket launched, the communication systems malfunctioned and ignition of the second booster terminated. Several Japanese firms were backing this project as they sought cheaper and easier options to put a satellite into space.

“This is still a small step and we expect more impediments, but once the launch succeeds, we see a potential for making the rocket launch cheaper and shorter in project time,” the space agency’s public relations officer Takayuki Tomobe explained.

Biggest satellite industry fails of 2017

China Aerospace Science and Technology Corporation

What happened: China’s most powerful rocket failed

On July 2, China’s premier heavy-lift rocket, Long March 5, attempted to launch an experimental communications satellite into space, but couldn’t. The initial ascent seemed fine. But after the rocket had shed its boosters, there appeared to be an unplanned delay in the core stage separation. With the second stage’s burn not meeting predictions, the rocket began to lose altitude.

Even as official news agency Xinhua confirmed that “an anomaly occurred during the flight of the rocket,” the failure spelled a big setback for the country’s spaceflight program… Because only a month before, Long March 3B had sent a satellite into the wrong orbit after an unsuccessful launch. Having two back-to-back failures certainly didn’t look good for China Aerospace Science and Technology Corporation.

Biggest satellite industry fails of 2017

Indian Space Research Organization

What happened: Satellite couldn’t leave its launcher after liftoff

For the first time in two decades, Indian Space Research Organization’s trusted Polar Satellite Launch Vehicle (PSLV) failed to complete a mission successfully when the satellite it was carrying remained glued to its launcher on August 31. While an investigation is underway to deduce the exact reasons for the failure, the glitch apparently came from the heat shield. ISRO announced that even though the holding apparatus inside the rocket had unclasped, the satellite couldn’t get out because the heat shield simply didn’t open.

It’s interesting to note that the satellite PSLV was carrying, IRNSS-1H, was itself supposed to replace another satellite in India’s regional navigation constellation (IRNSS-1A) after an atomic clock on the latter failed completely last year, rendering its ability to transmit positioning data to the ground useless.

And now we come to the swarm of private organizations and academic institutions whose satellites simply refused to work… all in one launch

Astro Digital

What happened: 2 satellites launched in July became unresponsive

Not too long ago, we wrote about the new kid on the satellite industry block, Astro Digital and its plan to put the entire system of earth observation on steroids. The startup aims to do everything from offering its own imagery to providing ultra-fast, on-demand data processing. And to this end, it launched Landmapper-BC1 and Landmapper-BC2 satellites on July 14.

By September 9, the company was forced to declare both the satellites as ‘officially unresponsive’. This announcement came after 6 weeks of failed attempts to resuscitate the birds whose ability to transmit data back to earth had been compromised ever since their deployment. Astro Digital suspects launch anomalies that could have led to conditions extreme enough to fry the key electronics on the spacecraft. The launch was carried out by a Russian Soyuz rocket, which brings us to the next entry on this list…

Dauria Aerospace, Moscow Aviation Institute, Moscow State University, GeoOptics, and UTE-UESOR

What happened: 8 out of 9 cubesats deployed failed to function

In total, the July 14 Soyuz mission carried 73 satellites into orbit. Soon, we learned that at least eight of the nine satellites sent by the above-mentioned organizations had stopped responding to the operator’s commands. The company that provided the launch services, Glavkosmos, was quick to blame the developers for this failure, stating that there was no evidence to support the rocket was responsible for the misadventure.

“It’s their first experience in cubesat development,” Launch Program Director Vsevolod Kryukovskiy said. “It could be something on the development side, or with components or ground stations.” But, once he was pointed to the issues with the established players in the small satellite industry, Kryukovskiy had to admit his failings. Read about them below…

Planet and Spire

What happened: One cubesat each faced an issue with the Soyuz launch

Soyuz carried 48 Doves for Planet and 8 Lemur satellites for Spire on its July 14 mission. While Planet was unable to establish contact with one of the Doves, the Soyuz accidentally released one of Spire’s satellites into the wrong orbit. Both companies decided not to make any noise about this matter.

Meanwhile, launch director Kryukovskiy has assured that the technical team is examining the final mission telemetry, and the report should be ready soon.

Say thanks for this article (0)
The community is supported by:
Become a sponsor
#Business #Featured
Global Top 100 Geospatial Companies – 2024 Edition
Avatar for Muthukumar Kumar
Muthukumar Kumar 01.31.2024
#Business #Featured #People
Explore the unexplored with Felt: Meet Sam Hashemi, CEO of the online platform making mapping effortless for everyone
Nikita Marwaha Kraetzig 12.7.2023
#Business #Featured
The Earth Observation Hub Report: 2024 Industry Trends and Analysis
Avatar for Muthukumar Kumar
Muthukumar Kumar 03.13.2024
Next article

Study Projects an Expected $10.12 Billion Global Value in GIS by 2023

The market surrounding geospatial information sciences and systems is projected to reach exponentially greater global financial relevance towards the new decade.

This “GIS” market – as of 2016 – was valued at an approximate $5.33 billion by a Markets and Markets report: “Geographic Information System (GIS) Market by Component (Hardware (GIS Collector, Total Station, LIDAR, GNSS Antenna) & Software), Function (Mapping, Surveying, Telematics and Navigation, Location-Based Service), End User – Global Forecast to 2023”.

The geospatial field is expected to reach a worth of about $10.12 billion by 2023, with a general expected increase of 9.6% between the years 2017 and 2023. However, this research report wasn’t created solely for a generalized view at geospatial technologic and scientific prominence. Rather, Market and Markets delved into the relevance of separate facets in the field. The report surmised that the functionality of mapping was valued at the largest market value in 2016.

A breakdown of the study’s primary participants, differentiated by company size, designation level and region.

This prominence is attributed to the increasing usage of maps for planning work, more specifically in agricultural and urban construction. Maps have also been reaching a steady usage in security, transport, and environmental development projects. The study also attributed much of this new mapping implementation to have been brought about by the rapid construction rates of both India and China.

However, maps aren’t the only facet of GIS that are becoming more popular. The sub field of GIS Collecting – or gathering data by drone or by hand, is expected to become more prominent in the general outlook for geospatial sciences.

This hardware market of geospatial sciences is expected to be one of the primary contributors to the steady increase of the overall profitability of geospatial products, with the usage of a multitude of data gathering methods attributing to higher costs as spatial imaging technology advances over time. GIS Collecting is reaching a mobile audience unique in comparison to other subsets of geospatial sciences, through applications like ArcGIS’ Collector Application. Further improvements on LiDAR technology – particularly in the use of transportation and self driving cars – are expected to also contribute a major amount of financial bolstering to the field of gesopatial collecting as well.

Construction, however, is determined to be the main contributor to the overall profitability of GIS, with the utilization of a greater variety of tech. Tying into the previous prominence of both India and China as the primary contributors to the profitability of geospatial fields, the APAC (Asia-Pacific) region is still projected to remain one of the largest markets for mapping technology.

Most of this construction boom is expected to be tied to providing housing for continuing population growth; planning for rural communities – such as those at risk for forest fires – is also a prevalent field. GIS planning in construction can be viewed in the planning for renewable and non-renewable energy sources. Fields of energy innovation are expected to expand in relevance in their own right in the upcoming years, as well.

Read on