Top satellite-based observations of fall 2022

Top satellite-based observations of September and October 2022

Here’s a summary of our highlighted satellite observations from the last two months. Observations are based on Copernicus Sentinel-2 satellites’ acquisitions. Although the autumn was not as varied by sudden atmospheric changes as the summer, it is still full of many astonishing observations. Starting with September 25th we celebrated World Rivers Day. Rivers provide us with drinking water, irrigation, transportation, and much more. We should take this opportunity to discuss and focus on possible threats and dangers, such as pollution or the long-term effects of increasingly frequent droughts. Below we can see the Mississippi River – the second-longest river in the United States. It’s flowing through ten states and is the birthplace of water skiing. 

Sentinel-2 image of the Mississippi River – view on the map.

The continuation of wildfires in Autumn

With the start of the fall on September 23rd, one could expect cooler temperatures, and thus also a leveling off of occurring wildfires. Unfortunately, Autumn 2022 still hit us with devastating wildfires, including a huge one in Zhetikara District in Kazahstan and the “Cedar Creek Fire” just 15 miles east of Oakridge in Oregon. The fire was estimated to be more than 92 thousand acres. Additional fires spotted this fall so far include:

  • Tecate area in Mexico
  • Canto do Buriti in the state of Piauí in Brazil
  • Namibia near Gam in Otjozondjupa Region
  • Laguna Mar Chiquita in Rivadavia Department in Argentina

Fire in Zhetikara District in Kazakhstan – view on the map.

Sentinel-2 image of fire in Tecate – view on the map.

Cedar Creek Fire on the east of Oakridge – view on the map.

Fire in Namibia near Gam in Otjozondjupa Region – view on the map.

Sentinel-2 image of fire in Rivadavia Department – view on the map

Other effects of the climate change

Melting Glaciers

As far as the effects of climate change are concerned, this time we focused mostly on what was going on near the poles. We can observe melting glaciers, a strong indication of the change that is happening to our planet’s climate. Rapid glacial melts in Antarctica and Greenland are influencing ocean currents, as well as rising sea levels. Over here we have some examples of visible changes in a span of just a few years. First, we have Freemanbreen glacier, which is one of the primary southern outlet glaciers in Svalbard. In the summer of 2022, the glacier experienced likely the most extensive melt in the region in at least the last 50 years (check out summer observations 2022). Another detectable effect of global warming is the melting of the Twitcher Glacier in Antarctica, in just six years. Rapid movement of glacier parts can be observed also in the central part of Antarctica. The latest changes in the Brunt Ice Shelf are signalling that it will probably break off and create an iceberg soon.

Changes of the Freemanbreen glacier in Svalbard – view on the map.

The melting of the Twitcher Glacier over the past 6 years – view on the map.

Rapid movement of a part of Brunt Ice Shelf – view on the map.


However recent changes are not exclusively connected to the poles. The beginning of Autumn was filled with hurricanes and typhoons. One of the most talked about hurricanes was hurricane Ian, which had devastating consequences for the state of Florida. In the presented animation mixed pollutants and waste products along with silt, are visible on the coastline.

The aftermath of Hurricane Ian – view on the map.


Even though volcanic activity isn’t directly related to seasonal changes, statistically volcanos are 18% more likely to erupt during the winter months than at any other time of year (season for volcanic eruptions). However, we can observe most volcanic eruptions no matter the time of the year. A great example of this would be the latest changes in the Nishinoshima volcano – with a certain decrease in activity compared to the latest weeks.

Changes of Nishinoshima volcano in the last few weeks – view on the map.

Open-source intelligence

Satellite imagery enables us to follow situations and events happening all over the world. On September 17 there was an opening ceremony for the Vistula Spit Canal in Poland, which allows bypassing of the Russian Strait of Baltyisk. Below we can see the construction of the Canal which started in February 2019. Moving to more eastern territories through satellite observations we can also monitor real-time events in Crimea. The image below shows Kerch Bridge in Crimea, before the massive explosion resulting in great damage.


Sentinel2 image of Kerch Bridge in Crimea, before the massive explosion – view on the map.

The construction of the Vistula Spit Canal in Poland – view on the map.

Say thanks for this article (0)
Mapping forest degradation
Stefan Mühlbauer 11.7.2022
Top satellite-based observations of summer 2022
Avatar for Marta Weber
Marta Weber 09.6.2022
Mapping in the deep: Why is 80% ocean floor still unexplored?
Ishveena Singh 05.2.2022
Next article

Mapping forest degradation

Deforestation and forest degradation take the second place in terms of greenhouse gas emissions after the burning of fossil fuels. Together with peat land fires they accounted for around 15% of global anthropogenic emissions of carbon dioxide between 1997 and 2006 and thus are a key driver of global climate change.

What is forest degradation?

Forest degradation is a qualitative change of forest structure as a result of anthropogenic or natural disturbances. The main anthropogenic driver in (sub)tropical countries is unsustainable logging caused by an expansion of timber demand due to economic and population growth. Other meaningful contributors are burning, disease or insect infestations, shifting cultivation, fuelwood extraction and the defragmentation of intact woody landscapes through deforestation.

The faces of degradation are manifold: it may present a small-scale textual change of the canopy structure or height, subtle disruptions, but can also end up in almost deforested areas with numerous patches of bare soil. Forest degradation always entails a loss in carbon structure, which can sour up to 75% depending on the location, type of forest, the intensity and extent of degradation. Apart from the decrease of above-ground-biomass, forest degradation is often a precursor to further forest loss, for instance when logging areas expand and finally end up in deforestation.

Logging is an important driver of forest degradation. Source: Forest news

Mapping forest degradation

Deforestation has been a successful application domain of earth observation data for many years leading to numerous studies, map products and initiatives. In contrast, the mapping of forest degradation is more challenging and still in early stages owing to the complexity of the concept: It becomes manifested in a often subtle change in forest canopy structure that is more difficult to detect and quantify than its complete removal. Earth observation has the potential to capture those forms of degradation that have a measurable effect on the canopy structure such as a change in spectral response and fractions or the formation of canopy gaps. Degradation processes which occur under the canopy of forests such as fuelwood extraction and understorey grazing are not detectible by remote sensing altogether.

The methods developed and tested rely on multi-resolution optical, synthetic aperture radar (SAR) or LiDAR data. Each sensor type has strengths and deficiencies. The combination of data from different sensor types can help to overcome shortcomings from a single source. Forest degradation has different effects in satellite imagery dependent on location and forest type. Thus, its detection requires rather a regional approach than a single monitoring strategy. The different degradation types determine the remote sensing method that will (need to be developed and) bring most success to capture it.

Figure of different forest stages. (Source)

Suitable remote sensing data for mapping, monitoring and quantifying forest degradation by sensor type


  • Optical sensors capture forest disturbances through their manifestation as change in spectral fractions and responses of the canopy
  • Degraded forest pixels contain fractions of vegetation, dead wood, soil and shade. The fractions can be isolated, for instance by Spectral Mixture Analysis (SMA), to classify the degree and extent of degradation. SMA measures the loss of vegetation either by a decrease of the green spectral component or an increase of non-photosynthetic vegetation. It supports degradation analysis caused by logging activities or fires. The DETER-B system of the National Institute for Space Research Brazil (INPE) is one of few national operational systems to detect forest degradation using SMA. It uses data from MODIS, CBERS and IRS (it’s former version DEGRAD used Landsat and CBERS data and ran until 2016).
  • The keyword “change” (of spectral fractions etc.) indicates that data with different time stamps may be useful for analysing degradation. The idea behind is that each pixel tells its own story expressed by its spectral reflectance over time. Change detection can capture subtle alterations in forest cover and condition and tends to be more reliable when the signal is observed over a longer time period. Seasonality is a challenge that time series approaches need to address: the spectral reflectance of a pixel may naturally change throughout time, e.g. a growing season, without being affected by a disturbance.
  • One example for a time series approach is the LandTrendr algorithm, originally developed for a multi-band time series of Landsat imagery. It observes spectral changes of a pixel over a longer period, ideally for multiple years, and breaks its spectral bands (also indices can be used) into linear segments. The resulting spectral trajectories over time make changes in the course of time (seasonality) and the variability of change evident. – When disturbances occur, a pixel’s value will be presented by a short steeply sloped line segment.
  • Visual interpretation as a method for capturing forest degradation concentrates on areas of high disturbance intensity. The quality of results depends on the spatial resolution of the input data and can become very precise when analysinv VHR imagery. However, it suffers from the limitations of time, labour and user bias and becomes challenging when the degradation intensity is low.
  • Beyond the spectral bands of sensors, indices can be beneficial for mapping degradation caused by fires, defoliation and mortality events (induced by insects, diseases, climate damage, etc.). Examples are the Normalized Burn Ratio (NBR) from Landsat, the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), woodiness indices and others
  • The data come from following satellites (not exclusively): Landsat, Sentinel-2, CBERS, IRS, RapidEye, MODIS, SPOT, Pléiades, Quickbird/WorldView/GeoEye



  • SAR data complement optical measurements allowing for observations in cloudy situations, which is highly relevant in tropical areas, where forest degradation plays an important role
  • SAR sensors are capable of measuring complete or partial removal of tree cover due to timber extraction (selective logging), clearings, roads and log decks. The degradation can be extracted in two ways: first radar intensity images reveal the change by the occurrence of new shadow areas (change in radar intensity/color), second the backscattered signal shows different characteristics owing to a modified forest canopy: a large canopy present in time1 will result in a different backscatter in the same location if it is removed in time2
  • The usage of radar data requires to work with a time series to detect the degradation as a change in backscatter or image composition
  • The detectability increases with tree size – the removal of a large tree with a big canopy through selective logging is better detectable than the removal of a small tree irrespective of sensor resolution
  • The implementation of a spatio-temporal filter to reduce speckle and precipitation effects decreases detection errors
  • Interferometry enables to generate canopy heights. The combination of digital elevation models exhibiting terrain and canopy height facilitates the detection of changes in forest structure/height and to finally estimate the above-ground-biomass (AGB)
  • The L-band SAR backscatter (~23cm wave length) has a direct response to large timer structures (trunks). It allows for the identification of deforestation, forest change and forest regeneration
  • P-band radars (~100 cm wave length) have the capability to create a vision of the surface beneath the forest canopy. They permit the generation of a digital terrain model and are currently only carried on airplanes. The biomass mission of ESA will launch the first space-borne P-band radar satellite in 2023
  • The data come from following satellites: TerraSAR-X/TanDEM-X, AILOS Palsar, Sentinel-1, JERS, COSMO-SkyMed



  • LiDAR data draw a 3-dimensional image of the distribution of vegetation and allow to detect changes in tree height and volume. LiDAR captures roads and surface structures that are beneath the forest canopy. Its estimates of tree heights are of high accuracy
  • GEDI: The Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation is a self-contained laser altimeter installed at the International Space Station (ISS) in 2018. It makes precise measurements of the forest canopy height, canopy vertical structure and the surface elevation beneath. Thus it facilitates the characterization of carbon and water cycle processes, habitat degradations, glacier monitoring and the generation of digital elevation models. GEDI is an initiative of the University of Maryland in collaboration with NASA Goddard Space Flight Center



Several methods have been developed and tested to capture areas of forest disturbance. The difficulty is the choice for an adequate method since degradation and forest type influence the signal backscatter in satellite imagery. The combination of methods and especially sensor types improves results. The capacity of detecting forest degradation relates to the intensity of disturbance – greater intensity is easier to detect. Also the characteristics of the data such as the spatial and temporal resolution of the satellite images influence the analysis of forest disturbances: higher spatial and temporal resolution images generally allow the detection of smaller scale disturbance. This usually implies limited study area and higher cost.


Initiatives related to forest degradation

  • Global Forest Watch from the World Resource Institute:
  • Terrabrasillis from INPE has a Deforestation Map, Degradation Map (DETER-B project, described above) and Vegetation Map from Amazonia and the cerrado landscapes. The methodology of DETER is explained here.
  • The EOMonDis project (Earth Observation Services for Monitoring Dynamic Forest Disturbances) has a forest disturbance and degradation product
  • The EO4SD forest management initiative from ESA has a Tree COver Density and Tree Cover Change product
  • The open-source resources for Forest Measurement, Reporting and Verification (MRV) is a knowledge platform that delivers resources to support countries and other users to operationalize their forest MRV processes. It has a section about methodologies related to forest degradation mapping (CODED).


The figure presents different stages of forest degradation due to selective logging in the Amazon forest and shows them on a satellite image: A exhibits an area of moderate degradation due to logging including areas of regeneration after past logging events. B shows an area of high degradation with numerous expoosed bare soil patches. C presents an area of low disturbance (Source: INPE)



  1. Open access paper on forest degradation
  2. Remote sensing of forest degradation: a review


Read on