Location Based Services – a little bit of theory



Fig.1.  Location Based Services

In this post I’m summing up a little bit of theory about Location Based Services (LBS) that I will use for my further academic research. In some papers, books and blog posts it is possible to see different terms interchangeably used to describe the same service: location-aware services, location-related services or location services. Nonetheless the term Location Based Services has been already used and acclaimed by most scientific and professional communities.

Location based services – definitions.

Although LBS is a fairly new domain of science one can find several definitions:

LBSs are information services accessible with mobile devices through the mobile network and utilizing the ability to make use of the location of the mobile device.” [1]

“Location-based Services are IT services for providing information that has been created, compiled, selected, or filtered taking into consideration the current locations of the users or those of other persons or mobile objects.”[2]

So basically LBS are using potential and capabilities of modern mobile devices, positioning technologies and mobile internet to deliver to user value added information or service based on his location. The main value of LBS for users is that they don’t have to enter location information manually but its automatically collected (with positioning technologies) and used to generate personalized information.
 Fig.2. LBS as an intersection of technologies
(Brimicombe 2002).
LBS – intersection of technologies.
LBS is a field that uses achievements of several technologies. Brimicombe in 2002 proposed to present LBS as an intersection of several technologies: Geographical Information Systems (GIS), Internet, and Mobile Devices (or New Information and Communication Technologies). This concept is pretty straightforward and doesn’t need much explanation. The crucial observation is that the technology is actually going in those three directions: information (Internet), mobility (Moble Devices), location (GPS, GIS). According to statistics only in the 4Q of 2010 there where 100.9 million units of smartphone sold. And it was the first time in the history that sales of smartphones was higher than PCs [4]. Moreover already 25% of users prefer using smartphones over a computer to browse the World Wide Web and the number is growing [5]. Conclusions? Decreasing prices of modern mobile devices are pushing Information Society to go mobile. Now how about location and Geographical Information Systems? People are getting more conscious about the spatial aspect of life. Due to popularity of Google Maps they are already used to certain location-based ideas and their utilization. Maps are in fact one of the first five priorities of Google for the future. Maps are naturally linked with space and for centuries they have been used to find position and to navigate. In the most basic model users where trying to localize themselves on the paper maps and to find their way to targeted place. With the development and release to the public Global Positioning System and first PNDs (Personal Navigation Devices) users started to utilize digital mapping in a mobile way. Therefore it is not a surprise that the most used application on Android and third most used application on iPhone platform is Google Maps. Google recently disclosed that 40% of all Google Map use takes place on mobile phones. There is as well growing number of users of popular Location-Based Social Networks (LBSN). Already well known in USA, LBSNs are gaining popularity in Europe and Asia.
LBS components.

Almost all LBSs are based on components present on the figure 3. All of them create LBS infrastructure and parameters of each of them are crucial for the service to work. Those components are: Service and Content Provider, Mobile Device, Positioning Systems, and Communication Network.
Fig.3. Basic components of LBS

Service and Content Provider
These are all companies providing service, data and that are responsible for the service request processing. Those providers are for example Location Based Social Networks or GSM operators.

Mobile Device
These are all non-stationary devices that are tools for the user to request the needed information. For example mobile phones, smartphones, PDAs, tablets, laptops. Those devices can have build-in  or external positioning module (e.g. GPS antena).

Positioning System
Positioning of the user is of course the heart of LBS. The user position can be obtained in several ways. The most common two of them are GPS with a several meters accuracy and the mobile communication network which uses one or more cell towers to determine the position of devices with several hundred meters accuracy. The other possibility is to use the position are WLAN stations – there are companies specialized in capturing information about wi-fi location and using it for positioning. This option is possible only in the cities because of need of high network density but it can give surprisingly good accuracy of several dozen meters. Other topic is indoor navigation which can use as well wi-fi or Bluetooth for determining position inside buildings.

Communication Network

The last component is communication network which is responsible for transferring the user data and service request from the mobile device to the service provider and then the requested information back to the user.

1. Virrantaus, K., Markkula, J., Garmash, A., Terziyan, Y.V., 2001. Developing GIS-Supported LocationBased Services. In:  Proc. of WGIS’2001 – First International Workshop on Web Geographical Information Systems., Kyoto, Japan. , 423–432. 

2. Axel Kupper – “Location-based Services: Fundamentals and Operation”, 2005, John Wiley & Sons Ltd,

3. Brimicombe, A. J., 2002. GIS – Where are the frontiers now?. In: Proceedings GIS 2002., Bahrain, 33-45. 
4. http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/08/idc-says-100-9m-smartphones-sold-in-fourth-quarter-pcs-outsold/

5. http://www.tnblive.com/article/jul/2011/one-quarter-smartphone-owners-use-internet-web-surf

I'm a professional always thinking outside the box and a self-confessed gadget addict. As a son of a professor of cartography I was surrounded by maps all my life and as a result spatial way of thinking and seeing reality is naturally embedded in who I am.


  1. Thanks for one’s marvelous posting! I genuinely enjoyed reading it, you could be a great author.I will always bookmark your blog and will eventually come back very soon. I want to encourage you to ultimately continue your great writing, have a nice evening!

  2. Hmm is anyone else encountering problems with the pictures on this blog loading? I’m trying to figure out if its a problem on my end or if it’s the blog. Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.

  3. Love the site, and I appreciate the article. I might also think there’s a great theory behind this: LBS, like other forms of tech-based info services, creates a double-edged sword: if we’re curious about the locale and its path, then it increases not only our knowledge, but also our sense of pathways and community. It’s like: Oh, we’re going here, and there’s also this, that and the other. I went to a computer store 30 minutes away for a special part, and also found a custom butcher, and a farm stand, and chose a different path home. If, on the other hand, it causes us (when not in a rush) to become focused on only arrival, and not on journey or the whole of place, then LBS is only a narrow tool, a Phillips head screw driver (or square drive, here in Canada). I don’t blame LBS for this, rather a general societal lack of curiosity in exploration and understanding that going there isn’t an origin or destination, it’s a path filled with possibilities, and understanding possibilities may lead to better economic and environmental decisions through trip reduction and better place knowledge.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here