The obstacles holding satellite remote sensing from going mainstream
Imagine it’s the early 80s. You meet one of your geeky friends, and he tells you about this fantastic new tech he’s working on:
— So, we’re using a number of satellites in the orbit which allow us to give you your exact position on Earth at all times. We call it GPS.
You lost him right about when he mentioned “satellites” and “the orbit”, but you respond politely, unaware of all the tech goods to come:
— But, I know where I am and how is that different from simply using a compass and a map?
The conversation goes on, and you mostly forget about it the next day. Decades pass. 90% of the apps on your beloved smartphone use location information, and you meet your friend again in the adolescence of the 21st century:
— Now we have this satellite system, that allows us to take high-resolution images of any place on Earth every day!
Although you still shiver on the sound of the word “satellite” and the only resolution you know is from the “4K” label on your TV, you try to respond to the best of your tech capabilities:
— Right… so how is that different from Google Maps?
EO Sector vs. The Mainstream
Forgive me, for the potentially incorrect assumption my dear reader, but in that story above, you’re the mainstream. We, the EO sector, are this geeky friend of yours in the second part. The conversations like this happen frequently, and that’s what a lot of us struggle with these days.
Although we love to share what we do with everyone, our responsibility is to first communicate and educate the government, institutions, and businesses in every possible domain to take advantage of satellite remote sensing to improve their services. Hopefully, as a consequence, you’ll be positively impacted directly or indirectly without even noticing it.
However, this hardly is reaching the mainstream on the GPS-scale, as mentioned earlier, and the biggest obstacle holding EO from achieving that is still – the system. I don’t mean “The system” as a something-you-shouldn’t-trust way. I mean the earth-imaging satellite system.
Let’s forget for a moment about different providers and which satellite belongs to whom because with the work done by spectator.earth and many others it will all be gone in some lets-hope-not-so-distant future.
We currently have around 700 EO satellites in orbit, with many more scheduled for launch in coming years. If everything goes as planned and some sudden, unexpected event doesn’t strike the global economy (yes, I wrote this beginning of March 2020), the number of the satellites should at least double in the next decade.
Different resolutions, different orbits. As far as frequency is concerned, if we exclude geostationary satellites, you can image any area on our planet multiple times a day with decent resolution. However, even if we successfully integrate them all, it’s still hardly a constant stream of information which is what we’re all used to these days. If we want an average person to take advantage of satellite imaging, the use of it has to so frictionless and straightforward, that people can come up with applications we would never think about.
Accustomed to all other technologies that are much more real-time, people would expect from all the space-buzz words that you can pretty much monitor any area you want with centimeter accuracy at all times.
We won’t meet those expectations very soon. One because of the technology and its cost and second because of the regulations. I’m pretty sure you wouldn’t be so happy to know anyone can visually track you in real-time anytime he wants.
So, where is the boundary? Is there a technological barrier luring from the future or is it going to be a regulatory or economic one and we’ll eventually hit the wall?
Future of EO will be exciting, judging by the pace it’s moving now, but depending on the how we steer this development and regulations enforced to attenuate its progress it may never reach its full mainstream potential.
From millions of satellite images to deforestation alert: Answering the 3 most frequently-asked questions
At Satelligence, we help companies and NGOs around the globe to end deforestation with satellite-based information. Reliable, real-time, and relevant. When we talk about deforestation detection, 3 questions always pop up:
- How do you use satellites to detect deforestation?
- How are you able to monitor the entire world?
- How do you turn that data into usable information?
Basically, what they ask is how we move from a satellite image to a deforestation alert that is relevant for their business.
We believe it’s important to be transparent about how we work. This blog explains how deforestation alerts are created from satellite images. How does a satellite see the world? How does Iterative Bayesian Updating detect forest cover change and how are these detected changes converted into relevant deforestation alerts?
How a satellite sees deforestation
Let’s say you are interested in detecting deforestation in the Leuser National Park, on the island of Sumatra, Indonesia. The region is known for its biodiversity and its most famous inhabitant: the orangutan. In the pictures below you can see two optical satellite images (Sentinel-2) that are taken on the edge of Leuser National Park. The picture clearly shows that some areas have changed between January and December 2019.
Let’s take a closer look at how a satellite ‘sees’ forest changes. Satellites ‘take photos’ of the earth’s surface and transform them into signals. In the figure below you see the signal from a radar satellite called Sentinel-1 through time. This type of satellite is perfect for working in tropical areas, because it can look through the clouds, unlike satellites with optical sensors like Sentinel 2 or Landsat.
Radar backscatter from forests is stronger than backscatter from deforested areas. Knowing this, you can see when the trees in this area were cut. The figure below shows a radar signal for a pixel in the area shown above.
Just as we can see the change in the signal, so can an algorithm. The algorithm we use is called ‘Iterative Bayesian Updating’; a method that was first applied to radar satellite images for deforestation detection by Wageningen University, in collaboration with Satelligence1.
In short, this method calculates the probability that an area is deforested and “stacks” these probabilities in an iterative way to have a higher degree of certainty about the deforestation event. The method first ‘flags’ pixels as possibly deforested, which can be confirmed or rejected with a later measurement. When we apply the Bayesian Iterative Updating method to the deforested area near the Leuser National Park we can see it in action.
Bayesian Iterative Updating in action
In the animation below we see the values as measured by the satellite for the individual dates. We can also see what these values mean in terms of probability of deforestation (P Deforestation) and the probability as determined by the Bayesian Iterative Updating method (P Bayesian IU).
In the third row, the algorithm flags the value as a possible deforestation event, but it is not sure yet. In the next measurement, it seems as though the signal has increased again, so there might not be deforestation. In the following two measurements, however, we see the signal decrease again, and this time the algorithm is sure there has been deforestation; it confirms the deforestation event. We use the flag date as the date of deforestation, because that is the first time we saw the change. In this case, we know that the area was deforested before November 29, 2018.
The example in this blog only uses Sentinel-1 (radar) satellite data. However, the same method can be used on other satellite data as well, such as Landsat (5,7,8) and Sentinel-2. Because all of the outcomes produce probabilities, these can be combined to have even more measurements resulting in even more timely and confident change detection.
How to monitor the entire world
Imagine a single pixel from a satellite having a 100 square meter surface area (10x10m). The total surface area monitored for soft commodity related deforestation in the tropics is upward of 3 million square kilometers. A quick calculation shows that more than 3 billion pixels need to be processed on a near-real-time basis. These large scale calculations can not be done on laptops or on-premise servers, so we need to move one step higher: The Cloud.
To get from raw satellite data to pixel-level change detection, hundreds of thousands of single satellite images are preprocessed, aligned and then processed with the change detection algorithm. This involves processing terabytes of data in parallel and requires a lot of computing resources. We do this, using an open system called Kubernetes.
Kubernetes allows you to use anything from a single computer to thousands of computers simultaneously. For example, pre-Kubernetes it would take more than a month to process the island of Sumatra, Indonesia. With Kubernetes, the whole of Indonesia and Malaysia, an area 10x larger than Sumatra, is processed in a matter of hours.
What makes a detected change actionable information?
When looking at all detected change, a lot of uninteresting change is picked up as well: changes in agricultural fields, water bodies or cities. But even when we only look at tree loss, that might be deforestation, but that might also be the harvesting of pulp plantations or plantation replanting of old oil palm trees. In order to take meaningful action based on the detected change, that needs to be filtered and ordered into something that’s called prioritized alerts.
At Satelligence we developed an alert prioritization framework to convert confirmed forest cover changes into actionable alerts. First of all, we define forest to be at least 1ha continuous natural tree cover. To ensure that we do not falsely classify an area as deforested, we go back to 1984 using the Landsat satellite archive and make sure that the area has never been deforested before.
Furthermore, we draft a list of alert conditions together with stakeholders. They, not us, define which type of alerts are most important. These conditions vary from a minimum deforested area to filtering deforestation that is within concessions or maybe varying area thresholds depending on whether deforestation happens inside protected areas or on peatland.
From alerts to action
Prioritized deforestation results by themselves are useless. Action needs to be taken in order to give alerts real power. These follow-up actions involve sending in-field teams to investigate an alert and engage with parties involved. This leads to a decreased likelihood of repeated illegal deforestation by those parties.
Another measure that companies might take is to stop sourcing from particular areas because the sustainability of the commodity grower can no longer be guaranteed.